10 YEAR ANNIVERSARY
Independent. Anti-War. Unbought.

Police Oppose Bill Banning Sexual Contact with Sex Workers

by | May 11, 2017

Police Oppose Bill Banning Sexual Contact with Sex Workers

by | May 11, 2017

[Ed. note: when police coerce sex workers into sexual acts with explicit threats of violence or simply with the implicit power of their badge, that is rape.]

Earlier this year, the Anchorage Police Department sent one of its top officials to Juneau with a request for lawmakers: Don’t pass a bill making it illegal for police to have sexual contact with a person they are investigating.

The proposed House Bill 73 and Senate Bill 112 are offensive to law enforcement officers and unnecessary because myriad laws and regulations already govern such conduct, said Anchorage Police Department Deputy Chief Sean Case.

But there’s an awkward caveat: In some “very, very limited” circumstances, the Anchorage Police Department wants to reserve the right for an undercover officer to have certain forms of sexual contact in the course of an investigation, Case said.

He knows that isn’t going to sound good. And he wants to explain.

A zero-sexual-contact rule would doom investigations of prostitution — which remains illegal in Alaska — because sex workers have in the past quickly caught on to what police are allowed or not allowed to do in the course of such investigations, Case said.

It all comes down to touching, he said: Prostitutes have used a technique known as “cop checking” to immediately identify officers and shut down an investigation.

“(In an undercover investigation) they ask one simple question: ‘Touch my breast.’ OK, I’m out of the car. Done. And the case is over,” said Case, offering a hypothetical example of what he thinks might happen if the law passed. “If we make that act (of touching) a misdemeanor we have absolutely no way of getting involved in that type of arrest.”

The lobbying appears to have worked. House Bill 73 and Senate Bill 112 are both waylaid in committee hearings and appear to be going nowhere in the Legislature, which is struggling to address Alaska’s fiscal crisis.

The sponsor of the Senate bill, Anchorage Democrat Berta Gardner, has all but abandoned her efforts, saying she has “decided to focus her efforts elsewhere.” She wrote in an email that an explanation from the Department of Law suggested the law wasn’t needed.

But the bills have succeeded in raising questions about how far Alaska cops should — and do — go when investigating prostitution.

Read the rest at the Alaska Dispatch News.

Alaska Dispatch News

Alaska's largest news site and daily newspaper, offering news, features and commentary with a statewide focus.

View all posts

Recent Articles

Recent

The Inescapable Smear of ‘Antisemitism’

The Inescapable Smear of ‘Antisemitism’

Last week, Bill Kristol’s son-in-law Matthew Continetti wrote an op-ed about the midterm elections for The Wall Street Journal titled “Anti-Semitism is on the Ballot.” “Rising antisemitism isn’t only a problem for Democrats. No one who travels in Republican or...

read more
USAID Was Never Only A Leftist Project

USAID Was Never Only A Leftist Project

Over the last year, a common narrative has circulated through conservative commentary about Latin America’s political shifts. Washington dismantled the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the argument goes, and conservative candidates began...

read more
The UAE’s Audacious Play To Co-Opt the United Nations

The UAE’s Audacious Play To Co-Opt the United Nations

The word “audacity,” defined by the Cambridge English Dictionary as “courage or confidence of a kind that other people find shocking or rude,” is, as its definition suggests, construed mainly in personal terms, and often, as with Barack Obama’s “the audacity of hope,”...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This