Korea: Peace Or Bunk

Read Scott Horton's new book Fool's Errand: Time to End the War in Afghanistan

The reason for my recent hysteria on Korea is simple: this is a problem that won’t go away by itself.  The best we can hope for are a couple more decades of stasis.  Korea, though, will remain a fault line vulnerable to whatever shifts of power or world politics occur.

There’s only one reasonable solution to Korea, and that’s the pursuit of a peace treaty.  Regardless of initial bargaining conditions demanded by the “crackpot” North, it must become the intent of US policy to pursue a treaty.  Especially now that North Korea probably has nuclear weapons, there’s no other reasonable solution to this crisis.

This is why I’m not consoled by deescalation.  Sure, I bet there is a cooling of rhetoric.  Until Rex Tillerson gets fired.  Until 10 years from now when President Chelsea Clinton, or George P. Bush “pivot” back to Asia to contain China.

Trump calming his rhetoric might actually be bad in this respect, because it means people will move on from this issue.  Right now, there are some who might sense the value of a peace treaty and the importance of this concession.

The only way I can perceive being wrong is if we’re lucky enough that the North Korean people somehow independently destabilize that regime and then also survive the aftermath.  I suppose waiting and doing nothing could lead to that outcome too, in theory.

- Advertisement -
Read Scott Horton's new book Fool's Errand: Time to End the War in Afghanistan
SHARE
Previous articleWhy Does Assad Buy Oil From ISIS?
Next articleNews Roundup 8/28/17

Zachary Sorenson worked for the United States Air Force for six years as a Navigation Officer. He recently quit because of a principled opposition to war. He considers himself to be a Libertarian, and studied Economics at the University of Maryland, College Park. He would like to see the resurgence of a non-political commitment to peace for its own sake, across the spectrum of ideologies.